Nove Prize
The Alexander Nove Prize in Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies
The Nove Prize was established by decision of the annual general meeting of the Association in March 1995 in recognition of the outstanding contribution to its field of study made by the late Alec Nove. It was first awarded in the spring of 1997 for works published during calendar year 1995. The current regulations are as follows:
- The prize, of one hundred and fifty pounds, is offered annually for scholarly work of high quality in Russian, Soviet and post-Soviet studies.
- A nomination may take the form of a singly or jointly authored book, or two or more related journal articles or chapters.
- Works nominated for consideration must be of a scholarly character, must be in English, and must have been published - as defined by the date of imprint or, if a periodical, the cover date - within the 12 months of the calendar year preceding the annual closing date for nominations.
- The authors of nominated work must at the time of nomination be members or associate members of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies.
- Awards will be made by a jury whose membership will be approved by the Executive Committee of the Association, and which will normally consist of former Presidents of the Association.
- The jury may divide the Prize equally between not more than two nominated works in any year; or they may make no award in any year in which no work of sufficient merit presents itself.
- Works may be nominated for consideration by the authors, or by publishers, librarians or other scholars.
- A copy of the nominated work(s) should also be supplied.
- The deadline for submission of nominations shall be 30 September each year in respect of publications that appeared during the previous calendar year. The prize is awarded (if a recommendation is made to do so) at the Association's annual conference in the spring of the calendar year following the deadline for submission of nominations.
- Nominations should be made on the standard form for this purpose, which is available as a download from this page, and submitted to the Press Officer of the Assocation.
The deadline for nominations for books published in 2007 is 30 September 2008. The judges for the 2007 Nove Prize are Maureen Perrie and David Shepherd. Winners will be announced at the 2009 conference
Past Winners
| 1996* | Geoffrey Swain, The Origins of the Russian Civil War (Longman, 1995) Stephen White, Russia goes dry: alcohol, state & society (CUP, 1995) |
| 1997* | Mark Harrison, Accounting for War: Soviet Production, Employment and the Defence Burden 1940-45 (CUP, 1996) Archie Brown, The Gorbachev Factor (OUP, 1996) |
| 1998* | Antony Cross, By the Banks of the Neva (CUP, 1996) Sarah Davies, Popular Opinion in Stalin's Russia (CUP, 1997) |
| 1999* | Lindsey Hughes, Russia in the age of Peter the Great (Yale UP, 1998) |
| 2000* | Peter Gatrell, A Whole Empire Walking (Indiana UP, 2000) G.S. Smith, D.S.Mirsky: A Russian-English Life, 1890-1939 (OUP, 2000) |
| 2001 | Roger Markwick, Rewriting History in Soviet Russia: The Politics of Revisionist Historiography 1956-1974 (Palgrave, 2001) |
| 2002 | Simon Franklin, Writing, Society and Culture in Early Rus, c 950-1300 (CUP, 2002) |
| 2003 | Stephen Lovell, Summerfolk: A History of the Dacha 1710-2000 (Cornell UP, 2003) |
| 2004 | Yoram Gorlizki and Oleg Khlevniuk, Cold Peace: Stalin and the Soviet Ruling Circle, 1945–1953 (Oxford University Press, 2004). |
2005 |
Andrew Wilson, Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World and Ukraine’s Orange Revolution (both Yale University Press, 2005) |
| 2006 (awarded 2008) |
Geoffrey Hosking, Rulers and Victims: The Russians in the Soviet Union, (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006) |
The Alexander Nove Prize, 2006 (awarded 2008)
Geoffrey Hosking, Rulers and Victims: The Russians in the Soviet Union, (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006)
In Rulers and Victims Geoffrey Hosking builds on his earlier work on Russian national identity in the Imperial period to provide a perceptive and thoughtful examination of the manifold contradictions of the Russian people’s experience in the USSR. Taking as a starting point Nikolai Berdiaev’s somewhat contentious notion that Soviet Communist ideology was a reincarnation of the Russian Orthodox concept of the ‘Third Rome’, Hosking argues that neither of these forms of messianism fully corresponded to the needs and interests of ordinary Russians.
The author’s magisterial overview of Soviet history focusses on such themes as the Bolsheviks’ nationalities policy in the 1920s and 1930s, the official fostering of Russian patriotism in the 1930s and 1940s, and the development of non-Russian ethnic identities in the post-Khrushchev period—a process that was accompanied by the formulation of a new brand of Russian nationalism. Hosking looks briefly at the creation of the Russian Federation in 1991 and predicts, somewhat pessimistically, that Russia’s post-Soviet identity is more likely to be that of a residual empire than of a modern nation-state. In his Conclusion, he engages with theorists of national identity who claim that nations are the product of modernity, and draws attention to ‘the paradox that modernization seems to have impeded rather than advanced Russian nationhood’.
Geoffrey Hosking’s book will appeal to general readers interested in contemporary history, but it also raises important questions about national identity which will continue to be debated by specialists. Both accessible and scholarly, this impressive work makes a major contribution to our understanding of twentieth-century Russia.
(Maureen Perrie and David Shepherd, March 2008)
The Alexander Nove Prize, 2005 (awarded 2007)
Andrew Wilson, Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World and Ukraine’s Orange Revolution (both Yale University Press, 2005)
"Virtual Politics is a stimulating, original and highly entertaining account of the uses and abuses of ‘political technology’ in the post-Soviet states. While the dark arts of spin doctors are not unique to that part of the world, Wilson argues persuasively that the distinctive political culture of the former USSR helped to create there the peculiar form of pseudo-democracy that he wittily describes as ‘virtual politics’.
Ukraine’s Orange Revolution is a thorough and detailed account of the dramatic events of late 2004 in Ukraine, effectively placing them in both their short-term and longer-term contexts.
The two books complement each other in many ways. Virtual Politics is a wide-ranging and conceptually sophisticated comparative study of a number of post-Soviet states, while Ukraine’s Orange Revolution provides an in-depth analysis of a single event in one country. The Orange Revolution involved ‘real politics’; as Wilson points out, it was a revolution within and against the system of ‘virtual politics’ which he had described in his other book.
The publication by a single author of two such different but equally distinguished books in a single year is in itself a major feat of academic productivity, for which Wilson deserves to be warmly commended. Both books, too, combine high scholarly standards with great readability. In all respects, therefore, Andrew Wilson is a very worthy winner of the Nove Prize for 2005."
(Rosalind Marsh and Maureen Perrie, April 2007)
*The awards for each year were awarded at the annual conference in the following year, i.e. 1996 awarded 1997.
